In my attempt to reach out to ALL males, I decided to donate my books to a California correctional facility for males to read and provide feedback. Their feedback is provided below and I have chosen to remove their names to protect their privacy. Feel free to make your comments in the comment box if you desire to do so.
"You have dared to reveal the thoughts, fears, and realities of dealing with the opposite sex. Your boldness of information will save men money, time and needless frustration."
"The fellows gotta keep/get up on this one."
"I thought that the book was very well written and informative by the author. It is a must read for any lame brother who gets suckered by women."
"My name is (name removed), but to you it's P.R the pimp. I've dealt with skezzers, hoes, and tricks, so I know how to deal with them acordingly.."
"The book was a good read and I enjoyed it."
"I thought it was cool, just that some of the words you use made me think it didn't apply. If you make a part two, change the language to widen your audience."
"The part the was written about the Suckerman was interesting. In light of the example the author use. The very center of the topic is a reminder to be careful of what you wish for."
"I felt that the book is enlighten to degree of a over all outlook. But you really can't judge all by one female. Their is no perfect person. Compromise and sacrifice to make a good relationship. Understanding and communication is key!!!"
"I like when the man said that when on the dinner date strike up a good conversation and just before the bill comes look her in her eyes and don't look away and ask her if she wants to see you again? And the rest you already know."
"I felt that some chapters in this book were extremely accurate and overall I found the book as a whole to be humorous and yet informative in a light reading quick paced style. Thanks for sharing."
"I've lived with a number of skeezer's and they made me what I am today. I like the book, it is a taste of reality."
"I think this author has gone threw it, so have I and most readers. This book is good, keep it coming brotha man."
"This reminds me of woman that I once dated, Miss Gold Digger, page 59. She was young, attractive and had the gift of gab, well so do I. We would clash. Overall the book brought great laughter and I as well as others enjoyed it."
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
YOU ARE THE FATHER: DNA May Not Be The Only Solution
I received an email and felt it necessary to copy and paste it here for your information. It amuses me as to how I am negatively criticized for calling no good, scandalous, females skeezers yet time and time again I can show justification for doing so.
It appears that DNA can be proven to a high degree who the father is but should he be required to PAY in ALL proven cases? Here is a perfect example (at the bottom of this blog) as to why he SHOULD NOT be required to pay child support eventhough it is biologically HIS CHILD.
People will say, "Well, what about the child? He/She didn't ask to come here". My response (which most refuse to agree with) is, "Let the child deal with the pain and suffering that the MOTHER has caused him/her by HER SCANDALOUS act of FREELY CHOOSING to collect sperm, conceive, go through child birth and bring that child into this world UNPREPARED and then seek compensation from a sperm donor that did not want a child. VERY FEW, if any, want to hold females ACCOUNTABLE and RESPONSIBLE for their INAPPROPRIATE and IRRESPONSIBLE behavior. Choosing to have a child WITHOUT a willing male participant agreeing to impregnate her and mutually parent that child is IRRESPONSIBLE UNLESS she is CAPAPABLE of providing the time, resources and finances WITHOUT him.
It's HER choice, HER body so let it be HER SOLE RESPONSIBILITY. When a female has a child and she knows (most of them do) that the male does not want children at that time, she is KNOWINGLY collecting sperm and making a decision to bring a child into this world WITHOUT the sperm donor's concent.
That act is NOT about the child. It is about a scandalous, selfish female and what she feel she can get or who she can attempt to control through EXPLOITATION by having that child. I consider acts like that to be PRE-MEDITATED CHILD ABUSE.
Many of you will say, "Well, he is part responsible for making that baby". I have another blog that I am creating to show exactly where HIS control of making that baby begins and end and where HER control of making that baby begins and end. I am NOT speaking of legal, financial responsibility. That's a totally different issue. I am speaking ONLY of who really has CONTROL of that situation.
This blog of who has control should put an end to that "he is responsible for making a baby" EXCUSE and show who is IN TOTAL CONTROL of conception, pregnancy and opting out of parental responsibility. Of course this blog will not apply to those that are "MENTALLY handicapped and not capable of making rational decisions", "PHYSICALLY restrained such that they have no control over their body" or "lying in a defenseless COMATOSE state".
Please feel free to comment AFTER reading this blog. I copied and pasted the words below and they are not mine.
-----
SHOOTING FOR SPERM
Published by Runteldat on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 12:17 am.
In “you are nastier than sin news,” word is that some woman is selling the semen of pro athletes to [desperate] women who yearn to have a baby by a baller. Or better yet collect child support from one.
It seems she’s collected the sperm of a dozen athletes and is ready to sell off her collection to the highest bidder.
According to the sperm pimp’s Web site, she’s already sold to two women who inseminated themselves and have gone on to collect child support payments in the give figure range.
Here’s a thought: Go get a job.
Still interested in taking the ‘you are the father approach’ to success? Well you’re in luck, the woman claims to have NBA All Stars and even an Olympian in her inventory. If you’re wondering how this woman got the kids of the pros, she allegedly collected samples from used condoms and then had them frozen.
I can’t. That’s nasty. Please be a lie. No woman could be that desperate, could they?
-----
It appears that DNA can be proven to a high degree who the father is but should he be required to PAY in ALL proven cases? Here is a perfect example (at the bottom of this blog) as to why he SHOULD NOT be required to pay child support eventhough it is biologically HIS CHILD.
People will say, "Well, what about the child? He/She didn't ask to come here". My response (which most refuse to agree with) is, "Let the child deal with the pain and suffering that the MOTHER has caused him/her by HER SCANDALOUS act of FREELY CHOOSING to collect sperm, conceive, go through child birth and bring that child into this world UNPREPARED and then seek compensation from a sperm donor that did not want a child. VERY FEW, if any, want to hold females ACCOUNTABLE and RESPONSIBLE for their INAPPROPRIATE and IRRESPONSIBLE behavior. Choosing to have a child WITHOUT a willing male participant agreeing to impregnate her and mutually parent that child is IRRESPONSIBLE UNLESS she is CAPAPABLE of providing the time, resources and finances WITHOUT him.
It's HER choice, HER body so let it be HER SOLE RESPONSIBILITY. When a female has a child and she knows (most of them do) that the male does not want children at that time, she is KNOWINGLY collecting sperm and making a decision to bring a child into this world WITHOUT the sperm donor's concent.
That act is NOT about the child. It is about a scandalous, selfish female and what she feel she can get or who she can attempt to control through EXPLOITATION by having that child. I consider acts like that to be PRE-MEDITATED CHILD ABUSE.
Many of you will say, "Well, he is part responsible for making that baby". I have another blog that I am creating to show exactly where HIS control of making that baby begins and end and where HER control of making that baby begins and end. I am NOT speaking of legal, financial responsibility. That's a totally different issue. I am speaking ONLY of who really has CONTROL of that situation.
This blog of who has control should put an end to that "he is responsible for making a baby" EXCUSE and show who is IN TOTAL CONTROL of conception, pregnancy and opting out of parental responsibility. Of course this blog will not apply to those that are "MENTALLY handicapped and not capable of making rational decisions", "PHYSICALLY restrained such that they have no control over their body" or "lying in a defenseless COMATOSE state".
Please feel free to comment AFTER reading this blog. I copied and pasted the words below and they are not mine.
-----
SHOOTING FOR SPERM
Published by Runteldat on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 12:17 am.
In “you are nastier than sin news,” word is that some woman is selling the semen of pro athletes to [desperate] women who yearn to have a baby by a baller. Or better yet collect child support from one.
It seems she’s collected the sperm of a dozen athletes and is ready to sell off her collection to the highest bidder.
According to the sperm pimp’s Web site, she’s already sold to two women who inseminated themselves and have gone on to collect child support payments in the give figure range.
Here’s a thought: Go get a job.
Still interested in taking the ‘you are the father approach’ to success? Well you’re in luck, the woman claims to have NBA All Stars and even an Olympian in her inventory. If you’re wondering how this woman got the kids of the pros, she allegedly collected samples from used condoms and then had them frozen.
I can’t. That’s nasty. Please be a lie. No woman could be that desperate, could they?
-----
Friday, June 5, 2009
Female Complaints About Men On Those Dating Sites
SEX, SEX, SEX... That is ALL males are looking for online.
It is so amusing to me how so many females will post photos on those online dating sites and then develop an attitude if CERTAIN males THEY AREN'T ATTRACTED TO respond in what is TO THEM an inappropriate manner.
Well let's examine what they post before we are so quick to jump on THEIR side and support their claims of inappropriate responses from males. Here are a few examples:
PHYSICAL TEASE:
- BOOTY POSE: They stand and turn their butts outward so that you can see it.
- BEDROOM LURE: Photos sitting or lying in their bed in casual or lingerie wear.
- SACRIFICAL OFFERING: Photos that bring direct attention to their cleavage and breasts.
- REVEALING CLOTHING: Short skirts, dresses with high slits, very low cut and open blouses and tight fitting tops or bottoms that enhances the breast and butt.
- LUSCIOUS, MOIST LIPS: I'm sure I don't have to explain that one to you.
VERBAL TEASE:
- I am sensual
- I am passionate
- I am open to trying new things
When a HETEROSEXUAL male sees those photos and reads those words in their profile whatelse is HE supposed to think of besides SEX? The problem is not his NORMAL, sexual thoughts or his response. The problem is that HE isn't participating properly in HER CONTROL GAME of TEASE.
These types of females may even go so far as stating, THEY DON'T LIKE PLAYING GAMES, yet it's nothing but a game to them. The truth of the matter is they don't like playing games that DON'T BENEFIT THEM. The two most common games played are:
1. The TEASE GAME - Look, desire but don't touch or talk about sex too much to me UNLESS I want you to do so.
2. The ADMISSION FEE GAME - If you want some of this, you will have to spend money on me and MAYBE I will reward you depending on how I feel about you.
Do I have a problem with their photos or words? Absolutely not.
WHAT'S MY POINT:
Males and females are sexual by nature. This is enhanced when males see a female or a particular body part of the female that we perceive to be attractive and stimulating. A female's BREASTS and BUTTS (certain ones) are stumulating to HETEROSEXUAL males so if females want to MINIMIZE the number of sexual thought and online comments to them regarding sex, they should MINIMIZE the amount of TEASING they do with their provocative and REVEALING photos.
Will the majority of them minimize their sexual teasing? Absolutely not.
Why won't they minimize their sexual teasing? Because of the ATTENTION and POTENTIAL BENEFITS they may receive from the male's desire for her.
CONCLUSION:
Am I saying that females SHOULD NOT post themselves online in sexual attire or poses? Of course not. They have the right to place on those site whatever they choose to as long as it complies with the rules of those sites. MY POINT is that if you post yourself in that manner, DON'T complain or get an attitude when the male(s) you AREN'T INTERESTED IN attempt to contact you or respond to you in a SEXUAL manner.
Males must understand the TEASE and ADMISSION FEE games and PLAY TO WIN at minimal cost to them. If they are going to interact with today's females they better learn my RULES OF ENGAGEMENT or they will GET PLAYED the majority of the time.
It is so amusing to me how so many females will post photos on those online dating sites and then develop an attitude if CERTAIN males THEY AREN'T ATTRACTED TO respond in what is TO THEM an inappropriate manner.
Well let's examine what they post before we are so quick to jump on THEIR side and support their claims of inappropriate responses from males. Here are a few examples:
PHYSICAL TEASE:
- BOOTY POSE: They stand and turn their butts outward so that you can see it.
- BEDROOM LURE: Photos sitting or lying in their bed in casual or lingerie wear.
- SACRIFICAL OFFERING: Photos that bring direct attention to their cleavage and breasts.
- REVEALING CLOTHING: Short skirts, dresses with high slits, very low cut and open blouses and tight fitting tops or bottoms that enhances the breast and butt.
- LUSCIOUS, MOIST LIPS: I'm sure I don't have to explain that one to you.
VERBAL TEASE:
- I am sensual
- I am passionate
- I am open to trying new things
When a HETEROSEXUAL male sees those photos and reads those words in their profile whatelse is HE supposed to think of besides SEX? The problem is not his NORMAL, sexual thoughts or his response. The problem is that HE isn't participating properly in HER CONTROL GAME of TEASE.
These types of females may even go so far as stating, THEY DON'T LIKE PLAYING GAMES, yet it's nothing but a game to them. The truth of the matter is they don't like playing games that DON'T BENEFIT THEM. The two most common games played are:
1. The TEASE GAME - Look, desire but don't touch or talk about sex too much to me UNLESS I want you to do so.
2. The ADMISSION FEE GAME - If you want some of this, you will have to spend money on me and MAYBE I will reward you depending on how I feel about you.
Do I have a problem with their photos or words? Absolutely not.
WHAT'S MY POINT:
Males and females are sexual by nature. This is enhanced when males see a female or a particular body part of the female that we perceive to be attractive and stimulating. A female's BREASTS and BUTTS (certain ones) are stumulating to HETEROSEXUAL males so if females want to MINIMIZE the number of sexual thought and online comments to them regarding sex, they should MINIMIZE the amount of TEASING they do with their provocative and REVEALING photos.
Will the majority of them minimize their sexual teasing? Absolutely not.
Why won't they minimize their sexual teasing? Because of the ATTENTION and POTENTIAL BENEFITS they may receive from the male's desire for her.
CONCLUSION:
Am I saying that females SHOULD NOT post themselves online in sexual attire or poses? Of course not. They have the right to place on those site whatever they choose to as long as it complies with the rules of those sites. MY POINT is that if you post yourself in that manner, DON'T complain or get an attitude when the male(s) you AREN'T INTERESTED IN attempt to contact you or respond to you in a SEXUAL manner.
Males must understand the TEASE and ADMISSION FEE games and PLAY TO WIN at minimal cost to them. If they are going to interact with today's females they better learn my RULES OF ENGAGEMENT or they will GET PLAYED the majority of the time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
